Who remembers HP 2013.4.0.0...?

[Antoine Latter]

Hi Mark,

I don't know what your approach is going to be for 'text' but if you will
be including versions 1.0.* or 1.1.* you'll also need to pull in a newer
version of 'parsec'. I've released parsec versions 3.1.4 & 3.1.5, whose
only changes bump the 'text' dependency to 1.0.* and 1.1.* respectively.

Take care,
Antoine


On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Antoine Latter <aslatter at gmail.com> wrote:

> I currently expect the change in parsec to be a simple change in the
> package description, so it will be fine for inclusion in the next platform
> if needed.
>  On Jan 9, 2014 7:47 AM, "Christian Maeder" <Christian.Maeder at dfki.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just noticed that text-1.1.0.0 was uploaded and that the (earlier
>> adapted) constraint (text >= 0.2 && < 1.1) for parsec-3.1.4 is again too
>> narrow.
>>
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/text
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/parsec
>>
>> I assume text-1.1.0.0 is an improvement that should go into the platform,
>> but the platform cannot keep track with such rapidly moving targets like
>> the text package.
>>
>> When can we expect the text package to become more stable?
>> Which text (and parsec) version should go into the next HP release?
>>
>> Cheers Christian
>>
>> Am 06.01.2014 12:29, schrieb Christian Maeder:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would propose to update to the latest text-1.0.0.1 version and other
>>> packages depending on it (ie. parsec-3.1.4)
>>>
>>> (A name containing 2014 would make more sense to me.)
>>>
>>> Cheers Christian
>>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140111/a915d488/attachment.html>