PVP proposal: don't require major version bump when adding non-orphan instances
Henning Thielemann
schlepptop at henning-thielemann.de
Wed Feb 26 18:14:04 UTC 2014
Am 26.02.2014 14:19, schrieb Christian Maeder:
> Hi,
>
> I tend to agree to this proposal, but I would like to encourage
> developers/researchers to invent something like named instances (or
> dictionaries), that are not transitively reexported and could coexist
> with current instances. (These would allow several, differently named,
> instances for the same type and class combination.)
I expressed the idea of programmable instance selection in the past:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2013-March/019533.html
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2012-November/018831.html
This approach may also solve the orphan instance problem, but I have no
idea how to design programmable instance selection.
However, I suspect that GHC assumes at several places that there is only
one instance per pair of class and type. What about packing and
unpacking of class dictionaries in existentially quantified types?
More information about the Libraries
mailing list