qualified imports, PVP and so on

[Carter Schonwald]

Yeah.  I think that idea was ok'd by all.



On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, Daniel Trstenjak <
daniel.trstenjak at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 03:18:45PM +0200, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> > Even with that flag, we'd still have a bit of a problem. It would be
> nice if
> > cabal could ignore an upper bound on template-haskell, but respect an
> upper
> > bound on some other package that *can* be installed with a newer GHC.
> Perhaps
> > adding that flexibility to cabal would be possible.
>
> I think that's a call for soft bounds (known to work with) and hard
> bounds (known to not work with) and the flag '--allow-newer' would be
> only allowed to overwrite the soft bounds.
>
>
> Greetings,
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org <javascript:;>
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140226/31e2b188/attachment.html>