Proposal: Add bifunctor related classes to base

[Andreas Abel]

I retract my bikeshedding attempt.

On 25.04.14 8:18 PM, Dan Doel wrote:
> ​In my code, I use (<&>) from lens when I need a flipped fmap:
>
>      let ys = xs <&> \x -> ...
>
> and do use Applicative for.

Maybe & and <&> become standard at some point, and then I am maybe fine 
to use them.  Only that "<&>", unlike "for", does not evoke any 
association to iteration in my brain.

-- 
Andreas Abel  <><      Du bist der geliebte Mensch.

andreas.abel at ifi.lmu.de
http://www2.tcs.ifi.lmu.de/~abel/