Counter proposal: Do not include whenM and ifM
Bardur Arantsson
spam at scientician.net
Mon Apr 21 18:16:35 UTC 2014
On 2014-04-21 18:55, Tom Ellis wrote:
> (Since Carter asked for new proposals to be started in a separate thread I
> am reposting the contents of an earlier message with additions)
>
> My (counter) proposal is that 'whenM' and 'ifM' *not* be added anywhere
> (under any names) because there is a completely generic alternative to these
> adhoc additions that warrants further investigation.
>
> The executive summary is that instead of introducing another function
> 'unlessM' to be used like this
>
> unlessM doesDirectoryExist path $ do
> putStrLn $ "Creating directory " ++ path
> createDirectory path
>
> we just use the existing 'unless' and a new generic combinator (<*>|) like
> this
>
> unless <$> doesDirectoryExist path <*>| pure (do
> putStrLn $ "Creating directory " ++ path
> createDirectory path)
>
-1, completely ignores the pedagogic aspects of the original proposal.
More information about the Libraries
mailing list