Gearing up (again) for the next release: 2014.2.0.0

[Johan Tibell]

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com>wrote:

> I'm not arguing about upper bounds in general. I don't dispute (and never
> had!) that upper bounds can in many cases allow builds to succeed where
> they would otherwise fail. I'm speaking specifically about the case of the
> Haskell Platform, which makes all version bounds in the package itself
> irrelevant by hard-coding exact versions of all dependencies.
>

The packages in the HP still needs upper bounds as the user can install
packages that require newer versions of packages that are in the platform
and a lack of upper bounds in the platform packages would cause cabal to
incorrectly try the HP version instead of installing a newer version,
causing a build failure.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140409/d26d0e31/attachment.html>