Gearing up (again) for the next release: 2014.2.0.0

[Vincent Hanquez]

On 2014-04-09 11:15, Erik Hesselink wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com> wrote:
>> 3. You have yet to demonstrate a single example of breakage to the HP that
>> would be caused by including tls.
> I don't want to get involved in the arguments about the other
> technicalities, but we've had breakages with the tls suite of packages
> in the past due to lack of upper bounds. Here's one quoted from an
> email to Vincent Hanquez:
>
>    The problem was that tls 1.1.2 doesn't list an upper bound on its
> crypto-pubkey dependency, but
> doesn't build with the new 0.2.* releases.
If tls 1.1.2 would be in the platform, so would crypto-pubkey 0.1.*.
so that's pretty irrelevant as Michael explained.

-- 
Vincent