Gearing up (again) for the next release: 2014.2.0.0

[harry]

Nick Smallbone-2 wrote
> I would rather not switch back to StdGen. We have stumbled into
> situations in the past where we can't falsify a property just because
> StdGen can't come up with the right random values - while (thankfully)
> extremely rare, it makes me uncomfortable that it happens at all.
> This mostly happens when generating random functions.

Is StdGen so badly broken that it can't be fixed in a future version?



--
View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Gearing-up-again-for-the-next-release-2014-2-0-0-tp5746660p5746767.html
Sent from the Haskell - Libraries mailing list archive at Nabble.com.