Proposal: Show and Read for Data.Ord.Down

[Edward Kmett]

+1 for getDown


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Ben Millwood <haskell at benmachine.co.uk>wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 06:16:57PM +1000, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>
>> +1 from me as well; furthermore, how about an "unDown :: Down a -> a"
>> record function or some such just to avoid the "\(Down x) -> x" usage
>> like how Krzysztof described?
>>
>
> I vote for `getDown` as it's just not often enough I feel like my Haskell
> code is instructing me to party.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/libraries<http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20130927/8502d356/attachment.htm>