Proposal: Add bool to Data.Bool
Carter Schonwald
carter.schonwald at gmail.com
Wed Sep 11 00:42:39 CEST 2013
Ok I agree with everyone.
On Tuesday, September 10, 2013, Christopher Done wrote:
> +1
>
> I use:
>
> bool :: (a -> b) -> (a -> b) -> (a -> Bool) -> a -> b
>
> which is better for point-free programming, but I'll go along with yours
> because bool :: a -> a -> Bool -> a is also useful.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20130910/fbdbd691/attachment.htm>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list