Text.Printf replacement?

[Evan Laforge]

Can't we consider them separately?  A new printf library is nice, and
so is moving printf out of base, but I don't see why one should hold
up the other.

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Joachim Breitner
<mail at joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 09.09.2013, 10:32 -0700 schrieb Bryan O'Sullivan:
>
>> Is this something we'd like to fix in the run-up to 7.8? Otherwise I
>> bet a small coin in the currency of your choice that it will get
>> forgotten :-)
>
> if there is consensus (and it seems there is), and someone creates a
> printf library in time so that users have to change nothing but their
> package imports to get their Printf-using code running again, then I’d
> say: Let’s do this now.
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
>
> --
> Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
>   mail at joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>   Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de  • GPG-Key: 0x4743206C
>   Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>