"Elvis" operator (?:) as a reverse infix form of "fromMaybe"
Dan Burton
danburton.email at gmail.com
Sat Oct 12 20:52:41 UTC 2013
Oh, you're right, my mistake.
-- Dan Burton
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Nikita Volkov
<nikita.y.volkov at gmail.com>wrote:
> Dan Burton, `maybeA <|> maybeB |> c` has type `Maybe a`, while `maybeA ?:
> maybeB ?: c` has type `a`. The sole purpose of `?:` is in extracting a
> value from `Maybe`, not lifting to it.
>
>
> 2013/10/12 Dan Burton <danburton.email at gmail.com>
>
>> It's not a completely different thing, it's the very same thing, but more
>> general.
>>
>> -- Dan Burton
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Nikita Volkov <
>> nikita.y.volkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> John Lato, you're offering a completely different thing and I would
>>> totally vote against it. Please don't flood.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/10/12 John Lato <jwlato at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> I'd prefer it if we had an operator in Control.Applicative such as
>>>>
>>>> |> :: Alternative f => f a -> a -> f a
>>>> l |> r = l <|> pure r
>>>>
>>>> if it doesn't already exist, this would generalize fromMaybe, and
>>>> complicated cases could be written as
>>>>
>>>> maybeA <|> maybeB |> c
>>>>
>>>> but even this could be easily written using <|> and pure, so I'm not
>>>> sure it pulls its weight.
>>>>
>>>> John L.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Nikita Volkov <
>>>> nikita.y.volkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I suggest to include this operator in "Data.Maybe" and "Prelude".
>>>>>
>>>>> *Implementation:*
>>>>>
>>>>> (?:) :: Maybe a -> a -> a
>>>>> maybeA ?: b = fromMaybe b maybeA
>>>>>
>>>>> *Use cases:*
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.
>>>>> maybeValue ?: error "Value is unexpectedly empty. This is a
>>>>> bug."
>>>>>
>>>>> instead of
>>>>>
>>>>> fromMaybe (error "Value is unexpectedly empty. This is a
>>>>> bug.") maybeValue
>>>>>
>>>>> 2.
>>>>> maybeA ?: maybeB ?: c
>>>>>
>>>>> instead of
>>>>>
>>>>> fromMaybe (fromMaybe c maybeB) maybeA
>>>>>
>>>>> *Name collisions:*
>>>>>
>>>>> Hayoo search gives only 6 collisions with 5 hardly fundamental
>>>>> libraries.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> * The nickname and the operator itself are inspired by the ones from
>>>>> Groovy language.
>>>>>
>>>>> ** The symbols of the operator are a reminder of plain old ternary
>>>>> construct.
>>>>>
>>>>> *** To understand the nickname look at the operator as on emoticon.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Libraries mailing list
>>>>> Libraries at haskell.org
>>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Libraries mailing list
>>> Libraries at haskell.org
>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20131012/d3a62227/attachment.html>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list