Flipped function application

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Simon Peyton-Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com> writes:

> I believe my previous participation in that discussion was to promote (|>),
> but at this point I don't really care what it's called, I just think that
> this operator under any symbolic name should be present in an easily
> accessible location, preferably in base libs.

+1.  I would very much like to see (&) in the base libs.  I have projects that
import lens only for the (&) and (??) (operator form of 'flip') operators!

-- 
John Wiegley
FP Complete                         Haskell tools, training and consulting
http://fpcomplete.com               johnw on #haskell/irc.freenode.net