Flipped function application

[Artyom Kazak]

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:12:28 +0400, Wvv <vitea3v at rambler.ru> wrote:

> Is it hard to read?
>
> xs # map $ (+ 3) . snd
>
> Or do you prefer next?
>
> map ((+3).snd) xs

To be honest, I find the former harder to read. It can?t be established  
objectively, though, as most people are already used to `map f xs` and can  
read it without any mental effort. On the other hand, I can see myself  
getting used to `xs # map $ (+ 3) . snd` (by reading it right-to-left:  
(+3).snd... through ?map-interface?... applies to xs; which is why I  
prefer <$>, by the way).