Proposal: Show and Read for Data.Ord.Down

[Ben Millwood]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 06:16:57PM +1000, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>+1 from me as well; furthermore, how about an "unDown :: Down a -> a"
>record function or some such just to avoid the "\(Down x) -> x" usage
>like how Krzysztof described?

I vote for `getDown` as it's just not often enough I feel like my 
Haskell code is instructing me to party.