Proposal: Add a strict version of <$> for monads
johan.tibell at gmail.com
Fri Nov 29 12:23:40 UTC 2013
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Twan van Laarhoven <twanvl at gmail.com>wrote:
> I don't like that this function is implemented for Monads, I think that it
> makes sense for some other functors as well. Though to do this 'properly'
> we would probably end up with another typeclass "StrictFunctor" or
> something, and that is perhaps too much unnecessary complexity.
Do you have an example of such a functor?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libraries