2013.4.0.0 proposal - getting to alpha

Carter Schonwald carter.schonwald at gmail.com
Tue Nov 26 08:18:15 UTC 2013


or just build ghc with the 1.18 cabal and keep it all the same :)


On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <
ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 26 November 2013 18:04, Mikhail Glushenkov
> <the.dead.shall.rise at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
> > <ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hurt, no; but it will make it inconsistent across platforms (as Linux
> >> distros typically just have meta-packages for the Platform, rather
> >> than an installer that can do this).
> >>
> >
> > You mean that Linux distros will have both 1.18 and 1.16, but 1.16
> > won't be hidden? Will this affect anything if 1.18 will be always
> > chosen by default anyway?
>
> No, but if the binary installers auto-hide 1.16, then there will be a
> difference between the various platforms.
>
> --
> Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
> Ivan.Miljenovic at gmail.com
> http://IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20131126/d7686be3/attachment.html>


More information about the Libraries mailing list