Who needs and wants parallelism-friendly core libs?

[Edward Kmett]

I'm happy to do that as well if you feel strongly, it just requires more
administrivia to coordinate, and the network graph on github shows the
activity across repositories anyways, so I tend to work by fork and pull
request, as I'm much more comfortable collapsing history on a repository
off to on side than I am on the official repo. *shrug*

-Edward


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan <bos at serpentine.com>wrote:

>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Edward Kmett <ekmett at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If nobody has any objections, we can use that as a sort of staging ground
>> for this sort of change before they filter up to the main repository.
>>
>
> I don't have a problem with you working on vector, but why wouldn't you
> just stage stuff on a branch in the main repo? If you do it in your own
> repo, that makes it effectively invisible to other people.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20131121/33024fbd/attachment-0001.html>