Who needs and wants parallelism-friendly core libs?

Edward Kmett ekmett at gmail.com
Fri Nov 22 00:31:40 UTC 2013

I'm happy to do that as well if you feel strongly, it just requires more
administrivia to coordinate, and the network graph on github shows the
activity across repositories anyways, so I tend to work by fork and pull
request, as I'm much more comfortable collapsing history on a repository
off to on side than I am on the official repo. *shrug*


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan <bos at serpentine.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Edward Kmett <ekmett at gmail.com> wrote:
>> If nobody has any objections, we can use that as a sort of staging ground
>> for this sort of change before they filter up to the main repository.
> I don't have a problem with you working on vector, but why wouldn't you
> just stage stuff on a branch in the main repo? If you do it in your own
> repo, that makes it effectively invisible to other people.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20131121/33024fbd/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Libraries mailing list