Proposal: add fusion RULES for Data.Maybe.mapMaybe

[Akio Takano]

Apologies, the subject of my previous email was wrong. It is about
Data.Maybe.mapMaybe, not Data.Map.mapMaybe.


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Akio Takano <tkn.akio at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Currently mapMaybe does not fuse at all. The attached patch implements
> necessary rules for fold/build fusion in both sides (the result and the
> second argument) to happen. When fusion does not happen, the function
> should behave exactly the same as before.
>
> I ran some benchmarks, testing cases where fusion does and does not happen:
>
>
> http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/takano-akio/mapmaybe-benchmarks/blob/master/out.html
>
> The benchmark code is:
>
> https://github.com/takano-akio/mapmaybe-benchmarks/blob/master/main.hs
>
> Discussion period: 2 weeks.
>
> Thank you,
> Takano Akio
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20131120/ec3dcbed/attachment.html>