2014 Applicative => Monad proposal

[John Lato]

+1 for AMP (with or without DefaultSignatures)
+1 for MINIMAL pragma


On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Dan Burton <danburton.email at gmail.com>wrote:

> I think that removing return from the Monad class and making it an alias
> of pure is the Right Thing to Do, but not yet. The proposal, as it stands,
> is very tasteful about how little it breaks. Let's keep `return = pure` on
> the back-burner for a while.
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20130524/87bc7006/attachment.htm>