2014 Applicative => Monad proposal

[David Luposchainsky]

On 2013-05-23 23:34, Stephen Tetley wrote:
> Though I've previously expressed a preference for Monad/Applicative
> changes being ratified as part of a language revision - I've changed
> my mind in the last few days.

I don't think you even need to change your preference here: the key idea
of this proposal is that it is possible to be applied almost entirely
without changing the standard. Once the Haskell landscape has complying
code, the step from recommending to enforcing the AMP is a very small one.

David