Votes for generalizing mapM &c.

[Edward Kmett]

There is also a poll with er.. somewhat biased wording that was being
floated around the #haskell channel that has received 100+ responses if you
want a broader spectrum response, even if its not very scientific.

Form:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lKckA0pA6K4uQ-UnnmjRR32PKHph0WeZoQeVTTQJZ4I/viewform

Results:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lKckA0pA6K4uQ-UnnmjRR32PKHph0WeZoQeVTTQJZ4I/viewanalytics?pli=1

-Edward




On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Casey McCann <cam at uptoisomorphism.net>wrote:

> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Ian Lynagh <ian at well-typed.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:49:29AM +0800, John Lato wrote:
> >>
> >> I suggest that we start a poll for a single, concrete proposal.  If the
> >> poll forum is by email or similar, I further suggest that replies be
> >> limited strictly to +1/-1.
>
> Here are the current totals by my count, ignoring any 0s:
>
> > * Generalise Prelude.mapM etc
>
> +13 / -0
>
> > * Remove Prelude.mapM etc
>
> +1 / -11
>
> > * Add more monomorphic variants to Prelude (e.g. whenJust)
>
> +0 / -12
>
> > * Nothing
>
> +0 / -13
>
>
> - C.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20130522/7da0cb97/attachment-0001.htm>