gabriel439 at gmail.com
Tue May 21 08:09:51 CEST 2013
On 05/20/2013 10:41 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote:
> could you elaborate on the other useful generalizations please? :-)
Sorry, I meant to say in my last e-mail that `mapM` would be analogous
to `fmap` when using the `pipes`-based `ListT`, not `lift`.
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Gabriel Gonzalez
> <gabriel439 at gmail.com <mailto:gabriel439 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I want to apologize to wren (and everybody else). I was tired and
> overreacted when the discussion started veering into making more
> breaking changes.
> I don't mind the Foldable changes too much. My main concerns are:
> * loss of monomorphism makes teaching more difficult
> * They can be generalized in other useful ways
> However, I don't consider those concerns show-stoppers.
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org <mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libraries