suggestion: A common type class for mutable variables

[Petr Pudlák]

Could you please just shortly comment about those two? I'd be interested 
to know.

Thanks, Petr

Dne 06/03/2013 08:32 PM, Edward Kmett napsal(a):
> I see little hope in standardizing as, heck, I personally have felt the
> need to use two of the different points in the design space within just my
> own code.
>
> -Edward
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:13 PM, harry <voldermort at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Henning Thielemann <lemming <at> henning-thielemann.de> writes:
>>
>>> I have started a Wiki page in order to keep an overview of all the
>>> existing approaches:
>>>     http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Mutable_variable
>> There seems to be a fair amount of duplication in all this ... any idea how
>> a "standard" approach could be selected?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libraries mailing list
>> Libraries at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20130603/e7d88f14/attachment.htm>