Proposal: Add Chris Done's "om" combinator to Control.Monad

[Stephen Tetley]

Um (-1)...

This just looks like a synthetic combinator to me (cue the arbitrary name).
Naturally it can make some code shorter (that's the point of combinators)
but I have reservations that the code is significantly clearer, more
appealing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20130725/9b40991d/attachment.htm>