Proposal: Add Chris Done's "om" combinator to Control.Monad
John Wiegley
johnw at fpcomplete.com
Thu Jul 25 21:16:57 CEST 2013
The function is:
om f m = (m >>=) . flip f
Allowing this typical usage:
om when (return True) $
print "Hello"
Thus, it allows one to do away with the monadic variants of pure functions,
such as "whenM", "unlessM", etc.:
whenM = om when
unlessM = om unless
"om" gets even more handy when you want to apply a monadic function to a
monadic value in yet another monad:
>>> om for_ (return (Just True)) print
True
Rather than the typical (which I must have written hundreds of times by now):
mx <- return (Just x)
for_ mx $ \x -> {- use x... -}
A rider to this proposal is to also add "nom = flip om", but I can live
without that one. "om", however, is handy enough that I've started locally
defining in all the modules where I find myself now reaching for it.
--
John Wiegley
FP Complete Haskell tools, training and consulting
http://fpcomplete.com johnw on #haskell/irc.freenode.net
More information about the Libraries
mailing list