Proposal: splitting the network package
johan.tibell at gmail.com
Thu Jan 17 02:50:02 CET 2013
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Kazu Yamamoto <kazu at iij.ad.jp> wrote:
> If I did not miss messages, many in favor of this proposal and no
> against. So, I think we reached clear consensus on splitting the
> network package.
> One problem is naming. The author of the "uri" package dislikes to
> rename it (to cgi-uri for example).
> So, I would like to take "network-uri" as I originally proposed.
> What do you guys think?
I think it's good enough.
More information about the Libraries