Performance bug in HTTP library affecting "cabal update"

Henning Thielemann lemming at
Mon Dec 9 18:14:59 UTC 2013

On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Christopher Done wrote:

> Woo! cabal update is always so slow for me.

Me too. And it takes a lot of space. Is there a reason why the unpacked 
00-index.tar is stored? It requires currently 110MB, while the gzipped 
version requires only 6MB. Sorry, offtopic.

More information about the Libraries mailing list