new MonadRandom instance; and maintainership
Brent Yorgey
byorgey at seas.upenn.edu
Fri Apr 26 21:43:28 CEST 2013
Right, the solution is that with RandT Maybe, upon failure the seed
gets thrown away. That is, mplus runs both its arguments with the
same seed. What I actually wanted was MaybeT Rand. That requires a
MonadRandom instance for MaybeT, which I will add.
-Brent
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:30:51AM +0200, Sjoerd Visscher wrote:
> Uhm, yeah, I forgot that you can still use monadic bind together with the Alternative methods.
>
> Never mind me!
>
> Sjoerd
>
> On Apr 26, 2013, at 12:22 AM, Felipe Almeida Lessa <felipe.lessa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't Alternative lead to the same bug?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd at w3future.com> wrote:
> >> Maybe a derived Alternative instance for RandT still makes sense?
> >>
> >> Sjoerd
> >>
> >> On Apr 25, 2013, at 8:28 PM, Brent Yorgey <byorgey at seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:47:57AM -0400, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:38:01PM -0400, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would like to add a derived MonadPlus instance for both Rand and
> >>>>> RandT. Also, since it seems that MonadRandom has no maintainer I
> >>>>> propose to take on its maintainership. Any
> >>>>> comments/objections/etc. welcome.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, ignore what I said about deriving an instance for Rand, that
> >>>> does not make any sense. However, adding an instance for RandT does
> >>>> still make sense. A repository with the changes is here:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://github.com/byorgey/MonadRandom
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll upload in a few days if no one objects.
> >>>
> >>> Puzzle time! Can you explain the semantics of the following code
> >>> (given a derived MonadPlus instance for RandT)?
> >>>
> >>> maybeFail :: RandT StdGen Maybe ()
> >>> maybeFail = do
> >>> r <- getRandomR (0, 1 :: Double)
> >>> guard (r < 1/2)
> >>>
> >>> succeed :: RandT StdGen Maybe ()
> >>> succeed = maybeFail `mplus` succeed
> >>>
> >>> I therefore rescind my proposal to add a MonadPlus instance for
> >>> RandT. However, I still volunteer to be the maintainer. =)
> >>>
> >>> -Brent
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Libraries mailing list
> >>> Libraries at haskell.org
> >>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Libraries mailing list
> >> Libraries at haskell.org
> >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Felipe.
>
>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list