Fix prelude definitions of abs/signum for Floats/Doubles
carter.schonwald at gmail.com
Wed Apr 10 21:13:54 CEST 2013
+1, would be good for me
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Felipe Almeida Lessa <
felipe.lessa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Levent Erkok <erkokl at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The current definition of "abs" and "signum" for the types Float/Double
> > not IEEE-754 compliant. To wit:
> > Prelude> abs (-0.0::Float)
> > -0.0
> > Prelude> signum (-0.0::Float)
> > 0.0
> > The correct result should be the other way around; abs returning 0.0 and
> > signum returning -0.0 when they receive a negative-zero. The same also
> > for the type Double.
> > The issue came up several times in several forums, with general consensus
> > that the behavior should match the IEEE-754 specs. Here're three
> > discussions on this matter:
> > Proposed fix: Section 6.4.4 of the report
> > http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/basic.html#sect6.4 gives "default"
> > definitions for abs/signum; which fails to take into account of
> > negative-zero values for floating-point types. An easy fix would be to
> > to the report a note on the status of negative-zero for Real/Float
> > instances; with individual implementations explicitly checking for
> > negative-0 first. For instance GHC's implementation can be changed as
> > follows:
> > instance Num Float where
> > signum x | isNegativeZero x = x
> > | x == 0 = 0
> > | x > 0.0 = 1
> > | otherwise = negate 1
> > abs x | isNegativeZero x = 0
> > | x >= 0 = x
> > | otherwise = negate x
> > A similar change would need to be done for the "Num Double" instance as
> > well. Of course, implementations can take advantage of the underlying
> > native floating-point abs/sign functions if available as well, avoiding
> > explicit tests at the Haskell code; based on the underlying platform.
> > Library guidelines suggest a discussion period of 2 weeks on this issue.
> > hoping that we can resolve the issue in a timely manner, and at least
> > implementation can match the desired semantics in the next release. If
> > there's consensus at the end of 2-weeks; I'll go ahead and create a
> > corresponding ticket for GHC.
> > Thanks,
> > -Levent.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libraries mailing list
> > Libraries at haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libraries