Network.firstSuccesful: 'throw' vs 'throwIO' usage
roma at ro-che.info
Thu Sep 6 12:05:00 CEST 2012
* Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr at gnu.org> [2012-09-06 11:40:23+0200]
> while reading over the source code of network, I noticed a use of 'throw' where I'd
> expect 'throwIO':
> import qualified Control.Exception as Exception
> catchIO :: IO a -> (Exception.IOException -> IO a) -> IO a
> catchIO = Exception.catch
> -- Returns the first action from a list which does not throw an exception.
> -- If all the actions throw exceptions (and the list of actions is not empty),
> -- the last exception is thrown.
> firstSuccessful :: [IO a] -> IO a
> firstSuccessful  = error "firstSuccessful: empty list"
> firstSuccessful (p:ps) = catchIO p $ \e ->
> case ps of
>  -> Exception.throw e
> _ -> firstSuccessful ps
> ...so, is `throw` used properly in the code above, or should it rather
> be `throwIO`?
> : http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/network/220.127.116.11/doc/html/src/Network.html#firstSuccessful
In this particular situation it doesn't matter.
If you use throwIO, then, if all actions fail, firstSuccesful will
return a proper IO action which, when sequenced, throws an exception.
If you use throw, then in the same situation the result of
firstSuccessful will throw an exception before yielding a proper IO
However, I agree with you that throwIO would be somewhat more idiomatic
here. (And IIRC I wrote this code, so you can blame me.)
Roman I. Cheplyaka :: http://ro-che.info/
More information about the Libraries