Proposal: Control.Concurrent.Async

Ross Paterson ross at
Tue Jul 3 18:56:06 CEST 2012

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 02:17:46PM +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 01:53:16PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > Good idea.  In fact, I've added a Functor instance for Async itself - it 
> > required a bit of refactoring but didn't add much overhead.
> So now you can simplify the interfaces of waitEither/waitAny et al?

Ah, that won't work with the Catch versions.

More information about the Libraries mailing list