Proposal: merge either into transformers
Ross Paterson
ross at soi.city.ac.uk
Wed Dec 12 17:05:05 CET 2012
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 01:24:36AM +0000, Ross Paterson wrote:
> A more economical variation on this idea would be to lift these classes
> to functors, e.g.
>
> class ShowF f where
> showsPrecF :: Show a => Int -> f a -> ShowS
>
> instance (ShowF m, Show e, Show a) => Show (EitherT e m a) where
> showsPrec d (EitherT m) = showParen (d > 10) $
> showString "EitherT " . showsPrecF 11 m
>
> instance (ShowF m, Show e) => ShowF (EitherT e m) where
> showsPrecF = showsPrec
To also lift Prelude classes like Show to Compose (which seems
desirable), we'd need to use an explicit dictionary instead:
class ShowF f where
showsPrecF :: (Int -> a -> ShowS) -> Int -> f a -> ShowS
instance (ShowF f, ShowF g) => ShowF (Compose f g) where
showsPrecF sp d (Compose x) = showParen (d > 10) $
showString "Compose " . showsPrecF (showsPrecF sp) 11 x
instance (ShowF f, ShowF g, Show a) => Show (Compose f g a) where
showsPrec = showsPrecF showsPrec
More information about the Libraries
mailing list