Proposal: add 'state' to the MonadState class

[wren ng thornton]

On 9/26/11 10:25 AM, Twan van Laarhoven wrote:
> But this function makes sense for all MonadState instances. I therefore
> propose to either add it to the MonadState class:
> [...]
> or as a stand alone function like modify. I personally prefer to add it
> to the class, since that allows for a more efficient implementation. In
> particular:

I'm all for either of the two proposals. If there are efficiency or 
correctness reasons for wanting it in the class rather than externally 
defined, then of course that is preferable.

-- 
Live well,
~wren