Proposal: Remove Num superclass of Bits

[Johan Tibell]

On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Bas van Dijk <v.dijk.bas at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 29 October 2011 18:25, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> wrote:
> > No. Do we know which packages would break? I imagine that downloading the
> > hackage tarball and grepping for 'instance Bits' should tell you.
>
> Where can this tarball be downloaded?
>

http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/hackage.html

"archive of just the latest versions of all the packages (230MB tar file)"


> > Also, does this have any performance impact?
>
> Performance should not be affected. After inlining all instances
> should use the same definitions.
>

Good. So none of the current instances use the default* functions?

-- Johan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20111029/955db7b1/attachment.htm>