Proposal: Remove Num superclass of Bits

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Samstag, den 15.10.2011, 17:41 -0700 schrieb John Meacham:
> I would just remove the bit and testBit defalut instances, they seem
> like reasonable primitives to be required for an instance.

I agree. Bits is certainly not something that a Haskell Beginner would
have to implement every day, but is more likely a task that requires
lots of thought and well-written code anyway. Having to implement these
two functions as well is not a large burden there.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de  |  nomeata at debian.org  |  GPG: 0x4743206C
  xmpp: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20111017/d4a12204/attachment-0001.pgp>