What's the future of the haskellYYYY packages?
Colin Paul Adams
colin at colina.demon.co.uk
Fri Nov 11 17:40:48 CET 2011
Simon> On 11/11/2011 15:06, Bas van Dijk wrote:
> I'm not sure to what extent we want to do this. So far we've only had
> to copy a few individual functions and fix export lists. The change
> to Num recently meant that we have diverged from Haskell 98 and
> Haskell 2010 in a fairly fundamental way, and to recover compatibility
> we would have to copy a lot of code into haskell98 and haskell2010.
What's wrong with copying a lot of code? It's not code that's going to
need maintenance is it?
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
More information about the Libraries