Proposal #3339: Add (+>) as a synonym for mappend

[Simon Peyton-Jones]

It's not so much a bug as it is code that is less than clear; while in this case cleaning it up is a good idea for other reasons, I suspect if we used that as a general metric most of GHC would have to be rewritten :)

Great.  I’d be delighted to look at it if anyone is motivated to give a brief standalone summary of the problem (and ideally a proposed solution)

Simon

From: Brandon Allbery [mailto:allbery.b at gmail.com]
Sent: 07 November 2011 13:56
To: Simon Peyton-Jones
Cc: Malcolm Wallace; libraries Mailing List
Subject: Re: Proposal #3339: Add (+>) as a synonym for mappend


On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 05:14, Simon Peyton-Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com<mailto:simonpj at microsoft.com>> wrote:
If there's a bug in GHC, or a feature request, can someone make a ticket with a standalone reproducible test case, please? I have not been following the twists and turns of this discussion.

It's not so much a bug as it is code that is less than clear; while in this case cleaning it up is a good idea for other reasons, I suspect if we used that as a general metric most of GHC would have to be rewritten :)

--
brandon s allbery                                      allbery.b at gmail.com<mailto:allbery.b at gmail.com>
wandering unix systems administrator (available)     (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20111108/ac0bc433/attachment-0001.htm>