Proposal #3339: Add (+>) as a synonym for mappend

Malcolm Wallace malcolm.wallace at
Sun Nov 6 21:48:44 CET 2011

> Aside: I don't think we should try to avoid collisions with downstream symbols when growing the base libraries. It's just not a scalable approach engineering wise. We should use namespaces to distinguish symbols from different packages.

Agreed.  But in this particular case we should remember that pretty was once part of base, and remains a ghc boot package.


More information about the Libraries mailing list