Proposal: Change to library proposal process

[Johan Tibell]

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Stephen Tetley <stephen.tetley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Many of the changes proposed on Libraries are controversial, I haven't
> counted but I expect uncontroversial (and accepted) changes are the
> minority rather than the majority of proposals (successful recent
> changes I can see from my inbox seem to be adding applicative
> instances for ST where they were obviously missing or fleshing out
> some of the Control.Concurrent modules).

Perhaps that's because no one would go through the trouble to propose
smaller patches as the work reward ratio makes it not worth it?

Johan