Proposal: Change to library proposal process
johan.tibell at gmail.com
Wed Jan 5 13:50:26 CET 2011
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Stephen Tetley <stephen.tetley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Many of the changes proposed on Libraries are controversial, I haven't
> counted but I expect uncontroversial (and accepted) changes are the
> minority rather than the majority of proposals (successful recent
> changes I can see from my inbox seem to be adding applicative
> instances for ST where they were obviously missing or fleshing out
> some of the Control.Concurrent modules).
Perhaps that's because no one would go through the trouble to propose
smaller patches as the work reward ratio makes it not worth it?
More information about the Libraries