Proposal: deepseq should not depend on containers

[Christian Maeder]

Am 04.01.2011 14:05, schrieb Johan Tibell:
[..]
>> If all code would be based on the same instances (provided by a central
>> package on hackage!) I see no problem.

Not one package but central packages like "deepseq-container(and
array-)instances".

> If I understand you correctly you're suggesting that the problem is
> solved by convention e.g. that all instances belonging to a particular
> type class is found in a particular package and no one should define
> an instance of this type class elsewhere? Is that a correct
> interpretation? I think there are at least three issues with this
[..]

C.