[Haskell-cafe] Faster timeout but is it correct?

[Bryan O'Sullivan]

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bas van Dijk <v.dijk.bas at gmail.com> wrote:

> Then we can use the TimeoutKey as our Unique (Note that a TimeoutKey
> is actually a newtype for a Unique):
>

That should be fine. It's not a public API, so changing it like that
shouldn't be an issue.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20110217/bbe3b05d/attachment.htm>