Proposal: Applicative => Monad: Is there any consensus?

John Smith voldermort at
Thu Feb 3 15:24:42 CET 2011

On 03/02/2011 15:54, Stephen Tetley wrote:
> I'd contend the proposal is too disruptive to be independent of a
> language revision, so I'd vote no on the proposal as it stands.

What do you mean by "independent of a language revision"? The idea is that, if accepted, this will be proposed for Haskell'.

More information about the Libraries mailing list