Proposal: add Int indexing functions to Data.Set
bos at serpentine.com
Sat Apr 30 19:52:38 CEST 2011
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Luis Casillas <luis at casillas.org> wrote:
> 2. Concern that Int-based indexing breaks the set abstraction by exposing a
> specific ordering (Trac comment by Malcolm Wallace). My assumption when I
> decided to submit this patch was that if it's OK for Data.Map to have these
> operations, then it should also be ok for Data.Set to have them.
I agree with Malcolm on this point. The int-indexed functions on Map
shouldn't be there in the first place, so I'd be unhappy to have them
spread. Those modules already have disagreeably bloated APIs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libraries