Proposal: Don't require users to use undefined
Roman Leshchinskiy
rl at cse.unsw.edu.au
Tue Oct 26 15:36:17 EDT 2010
On 26/10/2010, at 19:36, Bas van Dijk wrote:
>> How about:
>>
>> malloc :: Storable a => IO (Ptr a)
>> malloc = doMalloc Nothing
>> where
>> doMalloc :: Storable b => Maybe b -> IO (Ptr b)
>> doMalloc dummy = mallocBytes (sizeOf dummy)
>
> I don't think this will work because 'Maybe a' doesn't have a Storable instance.
Meh, it's late, just ignore me.
This is what I was thinking while typing the above nonsense. You could redefine sizeOf and friends to take (Dummy a) instead of `a' as an argument and then use this:
data Dummy a = Dummy
malloc :: Storable a => IO (Ptr a)
malloc = doMalloc Dummy
where
doMalloc :: Storable b => Dummy b -> IO (Ptr b)
doMalloc dummy = mallocBytes (sizeOf dummy)
In any case, for me this is not a compelling reason to break several widely used interfaces.
Roman
More information about the Libraries
mailing list