Contribution vs quality, and a few notes on the Platform process
wren ng thornton
wren at freegeek.org
Wed Nov 10 01:04:29 EST 2010
On 11/9/10 7:02 AM, Gregory Collins wrote:
> Maybe we should assemble a posse of volunteers, divide up the libraries, and
> spend a few hours each adding this kind of documentary material to try to make
> a real impact on the average quality level in the platform.
Perhaps we could make use of the haskellers.com SIG model to set this up
and popularize it.
> The cynic in me,
> however, suspects that the willingness to do this kind of grunt work is greatly
> overshadowed by the appetite to engage in endless rounds of mailing list
Methinks going with a SIG (with an associated hackathon) would help
overcome the intertia. Because, really, that's what it is. With large
community projects I've found that whatever the level of documentation
and testing is, people tend to roll along with it (with some energy lost
to friction :) Which means that things only really become a problem
when there gets to be little/no documentation. Bodies at rest; bodies in
motion. Certainly I've felt that packages like containers are
effectively static rather than under _active_ maintenance and open to
user contributions (the recent optimizations being the exception to
prove the rule).
More information about the Libraries