Haskell platform proposal: time-extras package
ekmett at gmail.com
Mon Mar 22 16:18:09 EDT 2010
I would definitely prefer to have the Data/Typeable instances in the 'time'
package itself wrapped with the same sort of prophylactic baggage that
surrounds it in the containers, bytestring, and other haskell platform
packages. It would be far less likely to cause confusion in the future than
with the profusion of solutions we see today:
* some packages providing it
* others requiring a third-party package
* and yet others not exposing enough details for third-party support to be
written at all
Regardless, some canonical location for those instances needs to exist to
prevent people from rolling their own contradictory instances.
So I'm a strong +1 to just including the instances in an appropriate wrapper
to be extended as more compilers add support, and a reluctant but still
sturdy +1 if you really feel that those instances really can't be in good
conscience be rolled into time.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Ashley Yakeley <ashley at semantic.org> wrote:
> Malcolm Wallace wrote:
>> At the time of that objection, I did not realise that "time" already
>> required Rank2. My preference would be for "time"s dependency on ReadP to
>> be removed in favour of a H'98 parsing combinator library, thus bringing
>> "time" back to true portability.
>> (Back in the autumn, I did spend some time attempting to re-code "time"s
>> parsing code precisely to remove the ReadP dep, but never completed it.)
>> However, you might consider that a step too far, in which case adding the
>> Rank2-requiring Data instances into "time" might be the better solution for
> Merging the Data instances into "time" is certainly my preference. But if
> there were consensus for it and code for it, I would consider a solution
> that made "time" not require Rank2.
> Ashley Yakeley
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libraries