Please don't deprecate Haskell 98 modules.
Bas van Dijk
v.dijk.bas at gmail.com
Mon Mar 15 16:47:43 EDT 2010
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Isaac Dupree
<ml at isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote:
> On 03/14/10 22:11, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 14, 2010, at 17:55 , Gwern Branwen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:44:46PM -0500, Gwern Branwen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> multiple patches which consisted solely of one line removing haskell98
>>>>> from the .cabal because the haskell98 modules *were not imported*.
>>>>
>>>> A general "Nothing from dependency is imported" warning would be great,
>>>> but trickier to implement. It's a similar problem to implementing
>>>> an "extension isn't used" warning.
>>>
>>> I've opened a ticket for this:
>>> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/643
>>
>>
>> Actually, doesn't the instances-are-global thing make this essentially
>> impossible without whole-program analysis?
>
> GHC will not find an instance that's never imported, I believe. Therefore
> dependencies that are nowhere imported can always be safely removed. Is
> this right?
No, there are packages that instead of exporting modules, export C
header files like bindings-DSL for example:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/bindings-DSL
Removing such a dependency will break your build if you #include these
header files.
However, maybe bindings-DSL is the only example of this type of package.
regards,
Bas
More information about the Libraries
mailing list