Parsec branch (was Re: Bug in Parsec.Token)
bernardy at chalmers.se
Wed Jun 16 03:28:41 EDT 2010
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Antoine Latter <aslatter at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:21 AM, wren ng thornton
> <wren at community.haskell.org> wrote:
>> I'd argue that it's acceptable, at least under this plan:
>> * fork parsec-2.1 as parsec2-2.1
>> * continue to develop parsec2-* (as desired)
>> * deprecate parsec<3 with message to switch to parsec2-*
>> * continue parsec>=3 as parsec-*
Why not use the version numbers 2.* ?
If you cannot do that, then it means the versioning scheme is broken.
More information about the Libraries