Proposal: Change to library proposal process

[Isaac Dupree]

On 12/28/10 02:20, Yitzchak Gale wrote:
> I am in favor of Ian's proposal, with the following additions:
>
> o A proposal must be accompanied by a concrete patch, or
> code, as appropriate. The patch or code should preferably
> not be included in the proposal message; it should be posted
> somewhere on the Internet, with a link to it in the proposal
> message.
>
> o One option is that a patch be attached to a Trac ticket;
> however, in that case, the proposer takes responsibility to
> close the Trac ticket immediately at the end of the discussion
> period if no consensus has been reached.

We could offer a wiki section (does our wiki let you attach files?). 
That would share the advantage of Trac (and e-mail) that full discussion 
history is kept even if the proposer attempts to replace the proposed 
patch with a new one at some date.